( doesn't mean she hasn't let the thought cook — just that it's come out rare. not quite to temperature, needs a little extra care before she can serve it and expect it'll satisfy any appetite for answers. the bubbles blip up, vanish. real-time footage of reeling through the options. for all they've faced and whatever's still waiting up ahead, stephen's a reliable pick for this — practice sessions for a mock jury before the real trial goes live. with its real teeth, hungry for blood and calling it justice.
she needs to get this right. koby needs her to get this right. )
if we're clearing august cuz his heads still holding up someone from doggy dog care who put their paws all over the crime scene his throat was torn into like a raw fucking steak. so i'm thinking newbie vamp or mutt with rabies
Edited (pretend i can spell PLEASE) 2025-10-21 23:47 (UTC)
[ For Giles, he means. Then again, for better or worse, no matter the evidence stacked against him, he's struggled to find Armand above anyone else in any of it. That makes it both easier and harder for him to say what comes next. ]
If your money's on him, I don't think creating doubt is going to help your numbers Shoring up an existing argument is one thing Providing an entirely new victim to fit a theory of tangled revenge one year in the making muddies the waters when you need them clear If Spike hadn't spoken up it would be different, but any public theory that contradicts his now will only show a lack of cohesion amongst those who believe Armand to be guilty, potentially weakening the argument for anyone undecided. Your word alone should be enough for the people already inclined to trust your insight.
[ In short: you don't need to do all that, if the priority is wanting him in cage. If the priority, however, is honesty, and to only put him there for reasons you're happy to stand behind - then back to the sounding board they go. ]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
( doesn't mean she hasn't let the thought cook — just that it's come out rare. not quite to temperature, needs a little extra care before she can serve it and expect it'll satisfy any appetite for answers. the bubbles blip up, vanish. real-time footage of reeling through the options. for all they've faced and whatever's still waiting up ahead, stephen's a reliable pick for this — practice sessions for a mock jury before the real trial goes live. with its real teeth, hungry for blood and calling it justice.
she needs to get this right. koby needs her to get this right. )
if we're clearing august cuz his heads still holding up
someone from doggy dog care who put their paws all over the crime scene
his throat was torn into like a raw fucking steak. so i'm thinking newbie vamp or mutt with rabies
no subject
[ For Giles, he means. Then again, for better or worse, no matter the evidence stacked against him, he's struggled to find Armand above anyone else in any of it. That makes it both easier and harder for him to say what comes next. ]
If your money's on him, I don't think creating doubt is going to help your numbers
Shoring up an existing argument is one thing
Providing an entirely new victim to fit a theory of tangled revenge one year in the making muddies the waters when you need them clear
If Spike hadn't spoken up it would be different, but any public theory that contradicts his now will only show a lack of cohesion amongst those who believe Armand to be guilty, potentially weakening the argument for anyone undecided.
Your word alone should be enough for the people already inclined to trust your insight.
[ In short: you don't need to do all that, if the priority is wanting him in cage. If the priority, however, is honesty, and to only put him there for reasons you're happy to stand behind - then back to the sounding board they go. ]